www.IsraelinEgypt.com
Biblical Archeology and Egyptology
The Second Intermediate Period of Egyptian History
Amenemhet III > Joseph > Israel > Hyksos > Enslavement > Moses > Exodus > Ahmose I
The Veil Removed
The History of
Israel in Egypt
- The Evidence -
Artapanus, Josephus, Apion, Africanus, Eusebius, Tatian, Diodorus, Ctesias, Herodotus, Clement, Hyppolytus, Ptolemy, Theophilus, Augustine, Syncellos, Freising, Aquinas, Anselm, Luther, Calvin, Guthrie, Whitefield, Edwards, Smith, Hales, Jackson, Ussher, Petavius, Petrie, Breasted, Heyes, Haag,
nearly all involved historians and theologians of over 2000 years are proven right in this work:
THE TIME OF THE HYKSOS
- the Second Intermediate Period of Egyptian History -
IS THE HISTORICAL AND BIBLICAL
TIME OF ISRAEL IN EGYPT.
This work solves all essential mysteries of Israel in Egypt AND all essential mysteries of the Second Intermediate Period
because the mysteries of the Second Intermediate Period ARE the mysteries of Israel in Egypt.
This way it unveils the gapless entire History of Israel in Egypt even between all biblical events:
The entire so called Dark Second Intermediate Period of Egyptian History is finally enlightened.
Over 1000 hours of research resulted in over 1000 pages including over 100 exemplars of archeological evidence matching the Bible.
Compare this work with any other referring work and find out whose evidence is superior in quantity and quality.
Join me on this amazing and inspiring journey and investigate over 100 discoveries of archeological evidence
for the time of Israel in Egypt from its Ensettlement to its Exodus and from Joseph to Moses
BASED ON TWO DISCOVERIES
They are based on the author’s translational rediscoveries in the Hebrew Bible unveiling a Foreign Ruler from Assur rose up in enmity over Egypt and enslaved Israel.
They are based on Herrmann Rönsch’s & Klaus Berger’s translational rediscoveries in the Book of Jubilees - canonical part of the Ethiopian Christian and Jewish Bible - unveiling a Canaanite King from Assur conquered Egypt and enslaved Israel.
BASED ON TWO KEY SOURCES
They are based on Schlachter 2000 Bible translator Roger Liebi‘s rediscovery of the ancient unmanipulated original Strict Bible Chronology unveiling the original time of Israel in Egypt 1821-1606 BC matching the first century Judaism Biblical Chronology of Israel in Egypt cited by ancient historian Josephus.
They are based on Kim Ryholt, leading egyptologist for the Second Intermediate Period of Egyptian History, and his research results regarding the crucial family relationships of Viziers and Pharaohs of the Second Intermediate Period.
For our Jewish g‘dfearing elder brethren: This Book is biblically over 95% based on Your Masoretic Text and contains several crucial Rabbinical Comments in each Chapter.
Copyright 2020
Stefan Clasemann
All rights reserved
First published in Germany February 23rd in 2020
by Stefan Clasemann, Alter Teichweg 162, D-22049 Hamburg, Germany
This web book is free accessible subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be copied and sold, hired out, or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any form of binding or cover or web presence other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. All rights preserved, apart from any fait dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988. No part of this publication may be produced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, optical, photocopying, audio recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. All enquiries should be adressed to the publisher.
Summary: An archeological and historical investigation into the Second Intermediate Period of Egyptian History and into the Biblical and non-biblical ancient documentations of the time of Israel in Egypt - Publisher.
Subject classification:
1. Ancient History
2. Archeology
3. Bible
For Anna Katharina Emmerich
ELABORATED PRIMARILY FOR LARGE SCREENS
CONSTANTLY UNDER FURTHER PROCESSING
CRUXSACRASITMIHILUXNONDRACOSITMIHIDUXVADERETROSATANANONSUADEMIHIVANASUNTMALAQUAELIBASIPSEVENENABIBASSANCTEMICHAELARCHANGELEDEFENDENOSINPRAELIOCONTRANEQUITIAMETINSIDIASDIABOLIESTOPRAESIDIUM
FOREWARD
Without this introduction homepage and without this foreword realizing what it is really all about gets nearly impossible for the average educated reader:
DOES THE BIBLE TELL THE TRUTH? Regarding this question THERE IS NO NEUTRAL SCIENCE because the Bible divides and polarizes the whole world and so with also Science; There is no real common neutral objectivity ensuring a common understanding and there is no real independence in Science regarding this question. ONLY BALANCED SCIENCE ENABLES US TO FIND THE ANSWER. Therefore Science’s most reputable and influential Bible opponents, the two leading archeologists for pre ancient Israel and Egypt, Israel Finkelstein and Manfred Bietak, are linked with their strongest relating lectures at the start and end of this work: This enables the reader to critically compare the best evidence for and against the Bible and decide on himself which evidence is superior refuting the other.
First target group of this work are simply said all incorruptible truth seekers who never stop digging deeper no matter how uncomfortable findings get. Second target group are mainstream believers who always wondered if rather one third or rather two thirds of the Hebrew Bible, the Tanakh, the Old Testament actually ever really happened - rather hoping than trusting that their Bible is mostly true and not mainly a disproven book of one millennium later written religious political lies invented to justify Israel's existence as indicated by modern archeologists and historians.
The author of this work introduces himself as a middle European Christian, scientifically academically educated in Economics (MSc), in Systemic Analytical Communication Psychology, and in Theology (as Priesthood Seminarian) including degrees in Modern Historical Criticism & Modern History of Biblical Israel - and finally autodidactic expert of Second Intermediate Period Egyptology.
Role Model and benchmark of this work regarding scientific rigor had originally been time period leading Egyptologist Kim Ryholt and his work „The Political Situation in Egypt during the Second Intermediate Period c. 1800–1550 B.C.“: This resulted in a work complexity, deepness and detailedness challenging the average educated reader nevertheless no truth seeker will finally regret his invested efforts in the end.
It is relevant for the reader to know that the author had been for over 30 years a rather progressive left liberal Christian mainstream believer who turned into a knowledgeable rather traditional strong believer standing with Israel after all groundbreaking discoveries made in this work.
„In how far is the Bible a book of trustworthy contemporary eyewitness accounts of historical occurrences?“ This question has the potential to lead truth seekers into greatest questions of their life:
WHAT IS TRUTH at all and does it really change with each generation? What is the difference between over three millennia enduring never really disproven faith and the modern psychological faith in Constructivism having conquered the 21st century? Constructivism is apostasy, the fall away from faith in the existence of the truth. It leads into the abolition of true & false and has imprinted modern historical science and archeology. So what is the difference between true & false and does it really change with each generation? What is the difference between neutral and balanced research? What is ideological political bias or religious bias and how can You balance and thus neutralize bias? What is the impact and difference of independent & dependent research? What is the difference in science between conservative rather right and progressive rather left and does the difference really change with each generation? What is the difference between conservative and left liberal believers and unbelievers? Last but not least the question
WHAT IS SCIENTIFIC at all,
and does the answer really change with each generation? What is the difference between Judeo Christian Historical Science before 1800 and post revolution secularism Historical Science? Does Historical Truth really change with each generation? What is the political difference between pre and post WWII Biblical Archeology and Historical Science? What is the difference between superior & inferior evidence and does it really change with each generation?
The modern world primarily trusts SCIENCE when it comes to finding out the truth. Because scientific evidence is generally seen as the most objective, neutral, independent, and least political source of truth. And when the modern world searches for information, it directly looks it up via Wikipedia. Wikipedia is the global predominant source of facts accepted as most trustworthy. It is increasingly replaced by KI researching first of all in accordance with Wikipedia again which is primarily citing modern historians and archeologists when it comes up to Biblical Archeology. Wikipedia Co Founder Larry Sanger warns that its editor base is skewing politically left regarding its valuation which sources are deemed "reliable". Statistically Wikipedia administrators are over 90% male atheists politically exclusively left liberal to far left. They block items and exclude editors. Wikipedia has the general reputation to be an objective neutral balanced source of information while it is widely perceived by experts as to exhibit a left liberal bias.
Transparency regarding the objective neutrality and independence of relevant modern archeologists and historians is also crucial for finding out the truth. For this reason any truth seeker needs to be aware of their religious, ideological, and political background and resulting interests and agendas:
The most crucial information in this foreword is that today statistically over 95% of Historians are politically left liberals. They are correspondingly primarily atheists rejecting the Bible as source of any pre ancient history. Statistics additionally reveal Historical Science is politically the most far left and so with the most far anti religious and anti biblical Science of ALL Sciences. And for over 80% of the archeologists we have politically the same situation: They are left liberals primarily anti religious and anti biblical minded: Their corresponding most plausible motive to choose of all things Biblical Archeology and History for becoming a subject matter expert is to prove their own convictions right meaning to prove the Bible wrong.
Equally left liberal EGYPTOLOGY is additionally uniquely characterized by its existential dependence on excavation permissions of the Egyptian Islamic Government. Islam is a predominantly anti Christian anti Jewish religion. So any excavation of archeological evidence confirming any pre ancient Israel in Egypt is religious politically rejected and ends excavation permissions. Post War Egyptology cannot exist without Islamic excavation permissions so Egyptologists have to avoid archaeological evidence confirming any historical Israel in Egypt. This is about Anti Judeo Christian left liberal islamic science-state cooperation and resulting scientific DEPENDENCY. Independency and Neutrality are declared core scientific rigor criteria of Egyptology. This foreword is intended to raise crucial awareness among truth seekers.
Archeologists and Historians of pre ancient Israel are also primarily left liberal atheists. Their anti religious attitude leads to the exclusion of pro biblical experts from leading scientific peer groups. Pro biblical peer group reviewed papers are primarily skeptically discarded as religiously biased pseudoscience since over half a century now.
The grandfather of Bible Criticism and precursor of Historical Criticism was also the grandfather of Anti Religious Atheism and Anti Christian Communism: The catholic priest Jean Meslier was a revolution and radical enlightenment adherent living around AD 1700.
Left Liberal atheistic Bible Criticism prefers three scientific appearing methods to declare any Bible‘s historical text value inadmissible:
a) „Later Redating“: Trying to redate the origin of a biblical text as late as possible up to one millennium later against text inner time data so that any possible historicity can be ruled out.
b) Psychological pre assumptions against text inner time data and the text copier: Highly speculative hypotheses often announce the earliest evidenced copier as the original writer; Then incidents of his time are artificially projected into the story. Then these artificial projections are pre assumed as projections of the copier pre assumed himself as text originator. These hypotheses have then allegedly disproven any possible historicity of the biblical text. This anti biblical pre assumptions based reasoning is called circular reasoning.
c) Misusing smallest differences in expressions as alleged proving evidence for as many different authors as possible of latest possible times: For instance when one and the same writer uses the name JHWH in order to focus on the relationship between god and persons and in other cases uses Elohim - even within the same sentence - then this is misused as proving evidence for alleged different authors of allegedly different epochs up to one millenium later than the text internal time data states.
These Bible disproval attempting methods are based on paradigmatic biased pre assumptions. They were originally developed as Bible Criticism methods. Later they even became generally misused as historical critical methods enabling left liberal Historical Revisionism.
The two original opposing political wings of Biblical Archeology and History are pro biblical Judeo Christian rather traditional so called Maximalism and anti biblical left liberal atheistic so called Minimalism. They have drifted further left at the turn of the millennium: Today the etiquette Maximalist is already handed out for an agnostic biblical scholar and theologian like Dever: He rejects any Biblical Israel in Egypt, any Conquest of Canaan, and any existence of biblical patriarchs like Abraham, Joseph or Moses. On the other hand field predominant Minimalists meanwhile illegitimize as unscientific ANY Bible matching archeological evidence at all. Minimalists like Thompson insist that any attempt to write history based on a direct integration of biblical and external Bible confirming sources is "not only dubious but wholly ludicrous". Already the founder of Biblical Archeology Albright who established the Rameses Exodus Time Paradigm was a rather left liberal agnostic than believer. He for instance thought that Abraham was an Amorite. And another so called Maximalist and Rameses Exodus Time lobbyist Hoffmeier discards as ahistorical the biblical 600.000 Israelites in Egypt, any Ten Plagues, any Sea Miracle, and any Mount Sinai event. To sum it up: The latest leftward shift in Biblical Archeology has relativized the meaning of Maximalism and radicalized the meaning of Minimalism.
Further practical incidence for the leftward shift in the field is the 2004 Controversy between already introduced Finkelstein and Dever; It is often labeled as controversy between Minimalism and „Maximalism“. The difference between Dever and Finkelstein is Dever does not categorically exclude any historical value of the Book of Judges. Now Dever accused Finkelstein of „postmodernism and nihilism“ and called him "idiosyncratic and doctrinaire". While Finkelstein dismissed Dever as a "jealous academic parasite". Dever later accused Finkelstein of supporting „post zionism“. Finkelstein then accused Dever to be a „biblical literalist“ disguised as a liberal. By way of explanation „post zionism“ claims zionism fulfilled its mission with the state of Israel in 1948 and should therefore be considered at an end. It is also used as term to refer to the Israeli Left and associates post zionism with anti zionism a left form of antisemitism. Finkelstein is often cited in cases of Islamic challenging the historical right of Israel to exist. Finkelstein insulting Dever as „jealous“academic parasite turns out from psychological perspective to reveal potential projecting onto Dever of own narcissistic attributes typical on such celebrity level: Envy, jealousy, and rivalry between scientists are indicators of narcissism eliminating neutral objectivity. Historical Science and Archeology in fields of high interest reveal correspondingly high levels of narcissistic personality traits and collective narcissism, a belief in the superiority of one’s own political group. Narcissism and resulting toxic competitive cultures have been linked to a higher risk of research misconduct: Narcissism within Science encourages data manipulation, conscious withholding of crucial information, and monopolization of credit.
In the first half of the 20th century rather left liberal believers and unbelievers founded Biblical Archeology: The Albright generation. Their modern partial apostasy opened left liberal atheistic Bible opponents the door to usurp this field in the second half of the 20th century. Since then discovered archeological evidence matching the Bible is politically rejected. Latest as soon as Bible matching archeological evidence becomes publicly well known, different options of offense become practiced in order to neutralize the evidence:
Option A) is illegitimizing Bible matching archeological evidence in order to neutralize it. For instance Avaris excavator and lobbyist of the meanwhile anti biblical Ramesses Exodus Time Paradigm Manfred Bietak delivers the verdict „Chronology does not allow“ any earlier Bible matching archeological evidence in Avaris than 13th century evidence. This is a subjective highly speculative hypothetical overgeneralization proclaimed as irrefutable fact based on reputations inside a certain left liberal anti biblical opinion leader circle.
Option B) is Bible matching archeological evidence is neutralized by distracting from irrefutable evidence by becoming personal: For instance pro biblical agnostic Egyptologist David Rohl became discredited by mocking parts of his private life story (he was a drummer in a rock’n roll band) as alleged evidence for missing trustworthiness. Second example is, archeological evidence confirming Israel in Egypt delivered by the Father of Egyptology himself Flinders Petrie, is politically simply discarded by left liberal atheistic Egyptology as religiously biased and „outdated“ without ever having disproven his evidence.
Many readers have learned from leftist Israel Finkelstein and his book “The Bible unearthed” that the historicity of the Bible has been disproven by Jericho and by the left assessment „there is no evidence“ for any historical existence of Israel before the House of David. The reader will already at the end of the first Chapter Chronology realize that all alleged disprovals of the Bible are easily debunked as three different kinds of anti biblical political lies:
A) Absence of Evidence is no Evidence of Absence: For example the Qumran Dead Sea Scrolls of 1950 have proven all Bible opponents wrong who had claimed biblical content essentially changed within the first millennium. The claim was simply based on absence of Hebrew text evidence older than the middle ages. „There is no evidence“ is also the strongest disproving argument of Bible opponents regarding the biblical time of Israel in Egypt, regarding Israel‘s Conquest of Canaan, and regarding the Time of Judges. Allegedly proven by absence of evidence, all three times never historically existed according to leftist’s Archeology and History of Israel. In this work all their alleged disprovals are collapsing like a house of cards.
B) The left liberal declaration Jericho has disproven Israel’s biblical Conquest of Canaan will already at the end of the first Chapter Chronology be debunked as Bible forgery based political lie.
C) The third typical political deception is dating manipulation of Bible matching archeological evidence: Newly invented chronologies that better serve any refuting of Bible matching archeological evidence are by political lobbyism simply established as „New Chronology“ (see Chapter Chronology the years 1006-971 BC).
In 2020 the author was still naively convinced it would just be a question of superior evidence if Science confirms any historical Israel in Egypt. It took the author over 5 years to fully realize that the for over half a century preached mantra „There is no evidence“ for any Israel in Egypt is not primarily a neutral independent scientific assessment status open to reconsider new archaeological evidence: Instead it has turned out to be a left anti biblical conscious disinformation policy.
The reader is invited to compare this work with any opposing work in order to find out whose evidence is superior in quantity and quality. All evidence is irrefutable since 2020. This work is no proposal candidate as any peer reviewed paper: This work debunks these peers of Archeology and History of Israel and Egypt as part of the biggest uncovered disinformation scandal in the History of Science …
The History of Israel in Egypt
Ancient Scriptive & Archeological Evidence
Leading historical scholarship since over two millennia up until its post war majority apostasy is irrefuably proven right in this work: The Second Intermediate Period the 13th to 17th Dynasty (c. Haag 1956 Hyksos p.740) is the historical time of Israel in Egypt.
(Examine deeper in Chapter Chronology)
The ancient Egyptian Saquarra and Abydos King List omitting ALL Dynasties of the Second Intermediate Period from the 13th to 17th Dynasty as FOREIGN rulerships (c. Haag 1956, p.31, Gardiner 1961, p.245) are irrefutably proven right in this work: on the one hand the 14th & 15th Dynasty and on the other hand the 13th, 16th & 17th Dynasty turn out to be foreign rulerships of distinguishable eastern Semitic origin.
(Verify in Chapter Chronology)
"Then a FOREIGN RULER (Egyptian: Hekakhasut Graecized: Hyksos), who did NOT ACKNOWLEDGE Joseph, ROSE UP IN ENMITY OVER EGYPT … they put SLAVE masters over Israel to OPPRESS them with FORCED LABOR."
Exodus 1:8 Optional Biblical Hebrew Literal Translation
(Examine deeper in Chapter Hyksos)
„Therefore The Lord says: 'My people living in Zion (Israel), do not be afraid of ASSUR, even when he strikes you with a stick and raises his staff against you, THE WAY IT WAS IN EGYPT.‘“
Isaiah 10:24 CBJ
(Examine deeper in Chapter Hyksos)
„For thus says The Lord: ‘IN THE BEGINNING LONG AGO MY PEOPLE WENT DOWN TO EGYPT to live there as aliens, and ASSUR OPPRESSED THEM for no reason.‘“
Isaiah 52:4 CBJ/CPDV
(Examine deeper in Chapter Hyksos)
" … the King of CANAAN when he inhabited the land of ASSUR fought … with the King of Egypt … After having CONQUERED the Egyptian King, the King of CANAAN makes the plan to OPPRESS THE ISRAELITES and executes his plan …
‘… LET US MAKE THEM SUFFER IN SLAVERY …’"
The Book of Jubilees 46:6.12.13 oldest original literal translation
(Examine deeper in Chapter Hyksos)
Historical science confirms that the CANAANITES, more precisely the CANAANITE AMORITES (Genesis 10,16), conquered ASSUR in the 18th century BC and usurped Assur’s throne for at least three generations (Shamshi Adad, Ishme Dagan, Mut Ashkur). Therefore that time indeed a King of CANAAN inhabited the land of ASSUR exactly as just unveiled in the Book of Jubilees. In the Second Intermediate Period of Egyptian History the tribes of Canaan mainly the Amorites violently ruled over the complete region of the Fertile Crescent from Babylon over Assur over Canaan to Egypt until their worldwide downfall.
(Examine deeper in Chapter Hyksos)
“… thy seed (Israel) shall be a stranger in a LAND (Canaan, Egypt) that is not their's, and shall SERVE them (Canaanites & Egyptians); and THEY (Canaanites) shall AFFLICT them four hundred years and ALSO THAT NATION (Egypt), whom they shall serve, WILL I JUDGE: and afterward shall they come out with great substance … But in the FOURTH generation they shall come hither (Canaan) again: for the iniquity of the AMORITES is not yet full … Unto thy seed have I given this land (Canaan) …the AMORITES … the CANAANITES …„
Genesis 15:13-21 KJV
"G’d was ungracious … and smote EGYPT … the ENEMY came from the EAST, CONQUERED the land easily, burnt down cities, destroyed temples and initiated MASSACRES AND ENSLAVEMENT …"
Ancient historian Manetho’s documented HYKSOS Invasion
(Examine deeper in Chapter Hyksos)
Leading egyptologists for this period Ryholt and Redford are irrefutably proven right in this work: Ancient historian Manetho’s documented VIOLENT HYKSOS INVASION of Egypt is historically accurate and archeologically evidencable for the CANAANITE HYKSOS of the 15th Dynasty. They are unambiguously distinguishable from the former Semites of the 12th & 13th Dynasty.
(Examine deeper in Chapter Hyksos)
In contrast to the well known Late Dating and Early Dating of the Exodus, ancient historian Josephus’ cited first century Judaism Strict Bible Chronology of Israel in Egypt refined by biblical scholar Liebi is the ONLY biblical Chronology that takes into account ALL time references in the Bible without ignoring, manipulating or changing ANY of them: It unveils Israel’s Settlement in Egypt in the time of Pharaoh Amenemhet III and Israel’s Exodus out of Egypt in the time of Pharaoh Ahmose.
(Prove deeper in Chapter Chronology)
Bietak excavated parts of a CITY OF OVER ONE MILLION SEMITES called Avaris beneath/ next to the town Piramesses: Their evidenced Settlement, tremendous Growth and finally their Exodus out of Egypt falls irrefutably right at the strictly biblical times of Israel’s Settlement, tremendous Growth and finally their Exodus out of Egypt. Bietak excavated a PALACE BURNT DOWN and (war) MASS GRAVES OF (massacred) SEMITES for 1729 BC matching Manetho’s documented Hyksos Invasion in the strictly biblical year of Israel’s ENSLAVEMENT. Bietak archeologically proves the CANAANITE HYKSOS came from a region including ASSUR …
(Examine deeper in Chapter Hyksos)
The last page of the Egyptian Brooklyn Papyrus 35.1446 SLAVELIST of around 1710 BC including many Hebrew and Biblical names is irrefutably matching exactly the contemporary biblical Enslavement and tremendous population growth of Israel in Northern Egypt.
(Examine deeper in Chapter Moses)
The biblical towns Ra’amezes = Avaris, Pythom = Lahun, and On = LeOntopolis are archeologically evidenced Semitic towns. Since 1729 BC having been enwalled slave ghettos all three were abruptly abandoned in the year of Pharaoh Ahmose’s claimed Hyksos Expulsion - for Avaris explicitly confirmed by Bietak. Confirmed by ten ancient historians this year is additionally archeologically unveiled as the year of Israel’s Exodus out of Egypt in this work.
(Examine deeper in Chapter Moses)
Rice, Oppenheim, Beckerath, Hayes, Helck, Kemp, Junker - all these leading Egyptologists are irrefutably proven right in this work: A hereditary Vizier office appointed and deposed as Pharaohs their own family members. At least three generations of a VIZIER family clan (Zamonth, Ankhu, Resseneb) turn out to be the REAL RULERS over Egypt that time. Vizier Zamonth turns out to be "the founder of the Vizier’s family in which the office was held for at least three generations.“ (Grajetzki 2009 p.36, pl.3) They established a Pharaoh rotation system and appointed over 50 Pharaohs within one single century. The down to yearly rotation of Pharaohs in the 13th Dynasty is to the greatest extent corroborated by Ryholt’s research results: “This period further witnessed no less than 24 kings (better: pharaos), whose reigns on the average lasted little more than one year” (Ryholt 1997 p. 298). His conclusion is proven right in this work for even 34 Pharaohs. According to Vallogia and Ryholt Pharaohs belonged to the Viziers’ family clan. According to Rohl THESE VIZIERS WERE evidenced SEMITES. Several Pharaohs are also irrefutably proven Semites by their Semitic names. The Strict Bible Chronology confirms that Joseph ruled as VIZIER over Egypt 1830-1750 BC. This timeframe turns out to be the rulership time of the archeologically evidenced VIZIERKING Zamonth in this work: Joseph (Zamonth), his son Ephraim (Ankhu) and his grandson Shutelah (Resseneb) turn out to be archeologically evidenced HEBREW VIZIERKINGS who employed their relatives as subordinate Hebrew Pharaohs.
(Prove all things in Chapter Joseph)
The most relevant ancient historians of the first three centuries - the greatest Jewish historian Josephus, and the greatest Christian historians Africanus and Eusebius all three based on the greatest ancient Egyptian historian Manetho - are irrefutably proven right in this work: HEBREW SHEPHERD KINGS - THE HOUSE OF JOSEPH - ruled over Egypt throughout the Second Intermediate Period of Egyptian History.
(Examine deeper in Chapter Joseph)
These ancient Jewish and Early Christian historians equated the Hekakhasut (Graecized: Hyksos) with Joseph and his ruling family clan and for two thousand years up until the post war majority apostasy it was generally considered in leading historical scholarship that Israel settled and Joseph ruled in Egypt in the time of the Hyksos (c. Haag 1956 Hyksos p.740). ALL of them are irrefutably proven right in this work.
(Examine deeper in Chapter Chronology)
The ancient Hebrew Book of Jubilees (48:6.12.14) and Egyptian Ipuwer Papyrus together unveil that Egypt became overcrowded by a certain VARIETY of Semitic foreigners in the Second Intermediate Period (c. Booth, Role of foreigners in Ancient Egypt, 2005). Seemingly the only evidencable distinction between the earlier Hebrew and the later Canaanite Semites was made by Queen Hatshepsut great granddaughter of Pharaoh Ahmose: Inscriptions unveil her distinction between the earlier „Hekakhasut … in … Avaris“ and the later „BARBARIANS in their midst destroying what had been built“ relating on contemporary priestly history writings describing the „BARBAROUS“ Hyksos Invasion from the further away east one millenium later also cited by historian Manetho.
(Examine deeper in Chapter Hyksos)
Aling, Wood, Stripling, Bimson, Rohl, Petrovic, etc. - many leading Biblical Archeologists and Egyptologists are irrefutably proven right in this work: Pharaoh Amenemhet III turns out to be the archeologically evidenced Pharaoh who enthroned together with his father Senwosret III Joseph (Zamonth Khnumhotep Kheti Senwosret-Ankh & Amenemhet-Ankh) as Vizier and unique Ruler over complete Egypt.
(Examine deeper in Chapter Joseph)
The Bible says Pharaoh retired and handed over ALL rulership power to his Vizier JOSEPH. JOSEPH‘s strictly biblical rulership over Egypt 1830-1750 BC is proven right by his contemporarily typical five different rulership names: His different names reveal the same Vizier Kingship timeframe, the same Pharaoh (Senwosret III together with his son Amenemhet III), the same wife (Henut), the same son (Ankhu), and/ or the same adoptive father and father in law (Khnumhotep II): JOSEPH‘s Vizier names turn out to be Zamonth, Khnumhotep, Senwosret Ankh followed by Amenemhet Ankh (biblical Zafenat Paneah), Khety, and in the 18th century BC additionally Monthuhotep. Khnumhotep Khety and Khnumhotep Amenemhet Ankh are both evidenced as two Vizier names of one and the same Vizier engraved in one and the same tomb inscription. JOSEPH (Zamonth) was the only Vizier of Egyptian History archeologically evidenced wearing the King’s beard. His Vizier names are additionally evidenced as King names: King Zamonth on Stela CGC 20102, King Khnumhotep on Stela CGC 20690, and Montuhotep on the Stela of his son Sobekhotep III as father of “Kingsons”.
(Prove all things in Chapter Joseph)
Ancient historian Artapanus is proven right in this work: Southern Pharaoh Khaneferre Sobekhotep IV married biblical Pharaoh’s (Northern Hyksos Khayan’s) daughter who pulled Moses out of the Nile. Moses became his stepson archeologically evidenced as Egyptian Crown Prince named Sobekhotep Mio.
(Examine deeper in Chapter Moses)
The idols who fell under the biblical Ten Plagues in the time of the Santorini Eruption turn out in this work as to be irrefutably the same ones who had archeologically evidenced been worshipped by the Israelites when they fell into idolatry in Egypt.
(Examine deeper in Chapter Moses)
Artapanos, Josephus, Africanus, Eusebius, Tatiana, Diodorus, Ctesias, Herodotus, Clement, Hyppolytus, and Ptolemy; All these ancient historians are irrefutably proven right in this work.
Pharaoh Ahmose I is the biblical Exodus Pharaoh archaeologically evidenced by the abrupt death of his firstborn son (Sapair) and by the abrupt discontinuation of construction of all his temples and his pyramid due to the collapse of the nationwide mudbrick production: Both archeologically confirm the biblical abrupt death of Pharaoh’s firstborn son in the 10th plague and Pharaoh’s biblical abrupt loss of all slaves due to the Exodus of Israel out of Egypt.
(Examine deeper in Chapter Moses)
Leading historical scholarship since over two millennia up until its post war majority apostasy is even chronologically proven right in this work: The (Canaanite) Hyksos occupied Egypt around 1730 BC (c. Haag 1956 Hurriter & Hyksos p.31) until Pharaoh Ahmose expelled them around 1600 BC (c. Roux 1964, 504-5). This is exactly matching the strictly biblical time of Israel‘s Enslavement 1729-1606 BC which will finally turn out in this work to be precisely the timespan of the 15th Dynasty of the Canaanite Hyksos and their Enslavement of Israel in Egypt.
(Examine deeper in Chapter Chronology)
New discoveries in this work will corroborate that CANAANITES from ASSUR invaded Egypt, enslaved Israel, and ruled as self claimed Hyksos of the 15th Dynasty over Egypt. This rulership ended with a global environmental desaster evidenced by the Santorini or Thera Vulcano Eruption. It shook Egypt and decimated its life and infrastructure: The Ten Plagues. Inscriptons on Pharaoh Ahmose‘s Storm Stela and the Ipuwer Papyrus are irrefutably matching many times exactly with the strictly biblical account. Finally Egypt’s entire Semitic population (Israelites AND Canaanites) evidenced abruptly abandoned Egypt at the same time; This is the time of the Exodus of Israel out of Egypt and Ahmose’s ensuing so called Hyksos Expulsion.
(Examine deeper in Chapter Moses)
The for this work valid Strictly Biblical Chronology of Israel in Egypt is roughly proven right by the RADIOCARBON results for Avaris and for the Thera Eruption in the time of Pharaoh Ahmose’s Storm Stela: The time between Israel’s Enslavement and Exodus turns out to be the time of the Canaanite 15th Hyksos Dynasty and is RADIOCARBON estimated roughly into the second half of the 18th and into the 17th century BC. This way Radiocarbon does in stark contrast to conventional estimates prove the strictly biblical time of Israel’s Enslavement right as the time between the 15th Dynasty Canaanite Hyksos Invasion 1729 BC and Pharaoh Ahmose’s Hyksos Expulsion 1606 BC directly after the Exodus of Israel out of Egypt; This is extraordinarily earlier than conventional estimates and shortens the 13th Dynasty of Vizierking Joseph after Pharaoh Amenemhet III into the first half of the 18th century BC again proving the strictly biblical chronology right and the conventional chronologies wrong.
(Examine deeper in Chapter Chronology)
Radiocarbon and all other research results in this work together unveil the main reason for all unsolved mysteries, inconsistencies and chaos in this therfore so called Dark Second Intermediate Period: The Egyptologists’ ignorance of this obvious rulership of three generations of Viziers over three Dynasties of down to yearly rotating blood related Pharaohs lead into their necessity to invent over a century of non existing non evidenced years in the 13th Dynasty in order to hold up their implausible theory all these quickly rotating Pharaohs were still Highest & King over Egypt. Radicarbon together with archeological evidence unveil that this neither evidenced nor existing century needed centuries to dissolve again back into zero.
(Examine deeper in Chapter Chronology)
Crucial fallacies, errors or disinformations of egyptologists are disproven by irrefutable evidence of superior quantity and quality eg.
a) the false lifespans of Khnumhotep II (POTIPHAR) around 1915-1878 BC and his (adoptive) son Khnumhotep III (JOSEPH) around 1898-1820 BC: POTIPHAR lived evidenced 1901-1819 BC and JOSEPH lived evidenced 1860-1750 BC matching Vizier Zamonth’s rulership time.
b) the false corpse of Khnumhotep III (JOSEPH) in his kenotaph mastaba mixed up with the body of a much later second usage of the tomb.
c) Khumhotep‘s (II) evidenced responsibility as overseer of the Eastern Desert until Senwosret’s (II) death year engraved on a Red Sea stela is mixed up as the false stela of Khnumhotep (III).
(Prove all things in Chapter Chronology)
JOSEPH’s biblical Slave Master POTIPHAR is irrefutably identified as Khnumhotep II BIBLICALLY AND ARCHEOLOGICALLY EVIDENCED as Court Official of Pharaoh, Mayor of the Palace, Chief of the Royal Personnel, Chief Executioner, Highest of Court and Law Enforcement, Chief of Pharaoh’s Prison, Chief of the Royal Palace Food Supply and finally High Priest of Heliopolis and (adoptive) father of JOSEPH (Khnumhotep III) and his later wife ESENUTH (Henut’sen). The Biblical Story of JOSEPH (Khnumhotep Khety) and POTIPHAR (Khnumhotep II) is hieroglyphically evidenced in POTIPHAR’s Tomb in Beni Hasan showing additionally JOSEPH receiving his Hebrew (not Canaanite) Family.
POTIPHAR (Khnumhotep II) is the starting point of this complete work for the egyptological decoding of JOSEPH (Zamonth Khnumhotep) and ALL his descendants in Egypt, most of Manetho’s Hekakhasut Shepherd Kings, Egypt‘s Hebrew Shepherd Kings according to Josephus, Africanus, and Eusebius, THE HOUSE OF JOSEPH in Egypt.
(Prove all things in Chapter Joseph)
And this is just the peak of a mountain of tons of discoveries of over 100 exemplars of archaeological evidence in this work unveiling the Biblical History of Israel in Egypt and enlightening the complete Dark Second Intermediate Period of Egyptian History.
Join me on this amazing and inspiring discovery journey and
study the biblically and archeologically evidenced
215 instead of 430 years of Israel's sojourn in Egypt
including 123 years of enslaved Israel under Canaanite Hyksos rulership
Explore the real Egyptian history in the exact time periods of
1821 - 1729 - 1606 BC
unveiled by the Bible
long forgotten ancient scriptures
and new archeological discoveries
This work is primarily based on research results of leading scientists like
Flinders Petrie - Kim Ryholt - Manfred Bietak - Israel Finkelstein - Herrmann Rönsch - Klaus Berger - Stephen Meyers - David Rohl - Roger Liebi
The History of Israel in Egypt
The Key Figures
In order to avoid getting lost in the complexity of this work it might be helpful to be introduced to the biblical key figures all enlightened in this work with their archeologically evidenced Egyptian names mostly based on leading Egyptologist Ryholt’s elaborated family relationships:
JOSEPH son of JACOB
became Vizier & King of Egypt
Zamonth Khnumhotep
JOSEPH’s slavemaster POTIPHAR
was Pharaoh’s chamberlain Khnumhotep II
JOSEPH’s biblical Pharaoh
was Senwosret III and his son Amenemhet III
JOSEPH’s wife
ASENAT or ESENUT
was originally named
Enutsen or Henut
JOSEPH’s sons
EPHRAIM & MANASSE
were the Viziers of Egypt
Ankhu & Senebefni
THE NEW KING
WHO ENSLAVED ISRAEL
was the first Canaanite Hyksos King Samuquenu
JOSEPH‘s grandsons
SHUTELAH & TANACH
became Vizierkings of Southern Egypt
Resseneb & Ayameru I
PHARAOS DAUGHTER
who pulled MOSES out of the Nile
was Mereryt daughter of
Hyksos King Khayan
Her husband
Southern Pharao Khanephere
became MOSES‘ stepfather
and King over Egypt
Sobekhotep IV
LEVI‘s great grandson
MOSES became
Crown Prince of Egypt
Sobekhotep Mio
PHARAO of the TEN PLAGUES
was Southern Pharaoh
Ahmose
Biblical KING OF EGYPT who chased after Israel into the Red Sea
was the last Canaanite Hyksos King of Egypt
Khamudi
These were the key figures
of a period of 125 Pharaohs
- nearly all enlightened in this work -
in 215 years of the Second Intermediate Period of Egyptian History
- the time of Israel in Egypt -
and they all archeologically match the biblical account as unveiled in this work.
JOSEPH (Zamonth Khnumhotep), his slavemaster POTIPHAR (Khnumhotep), his wife ASENATH (Henut), his twin sons EPHRAIM (Ankhu) and MANASSE (Senebefni), the entire HOUSE OF JOSEPH across three Dynasties always known as SHEPHERD KINGS, PHARAOH (Amenemhet) OF ISRAELS ENSETTLEMENT, the biblical NEW KING (Samuquenu) WHO ENSLAVED ISRAEL, MOSES (Sobehotep Mio) as Prince of Egypt, PHARAOH (Ahmose) OF THE TEN PLAGUES AND THE EXODUS, and finally the biblical KING OF EGYPT (Khamudi) who sank in the Red Sea with his complete army; ALL OF THEM are irrefutably unveiled as archeologically evidenced HISTORICAL figures of the Second Intermediate Period of Egyptian History - THE TIME OF ISRAEL IN EGYPT.
Compare this work with others and find out whose evidence is superior in quantity and quality.
Every truthseeker is invited to enjoy this discovery journey with an open minded critical attitude:
"The historical saga contained in the Bible -
from Abraham's encounter with G’d and his journey to Canaan to Moses' deliverance of the children of Israel out of bondage ... (is) a brilliant product of the human imagination." ... "The Exodus did not happen at the time and in the manner described in the Bible ... excavations ... have not provided even the slightest evidence."
(Finkelstein 2001, The Bible Unearthed, p. 7 & 63)
Is there really “no evidence” of any Israel in Egypt preached like a mantra together with the Exodus Ramesses Time Paradigm since over two generations now?
Leading Biblical Archeology and Egyptology since it’s change from a majority of believers to unbelievers after WWII claim Israel in Egypt never existed: Their Exodus from Egypt allegedly NEVER happened and at the same time MUST have happened in the 13th century BC the time of Pharaoh Ramesses. Any earlier time is declared as inadmissible. Before the first Canaanite Hyksos Pharaoh rose up the same Canaanites would allegedly already have settled in Egypt for a century. Thus even the violent Hyksos Invasion into Egypt in ancient historians’ writings nowadays all of a sudden allegedly never happened claimed by leading egyptologist Bietak. Thus all over one million Semites of the Second Intermediate Period of Egypt and all Semites in Canaan of the time of Judges before the time of the Kings are declared by Bietak (2016, pp. 267–268) and Finkelstein together as to be irrefutably exclusively Canaanites. The Israelites themselves are even declared as to be originally their own archenemy the Canaanites (Finkelstein’s & Bietak’s lectures are linked in the Chapter Overview).
What is behind all these proclamations and science dominating paradigms robbing Israel its history and identity and the Bible its credibility?
In how far are they proven neutral, objective, independent, truth seeking science?
The veil over these questions will have been removed at the end of this work.
Despite the best efforts of ancient propaganda driven pharaohs and modern anti biblical agenda driven scholars, excavations have provided an amazing solid frame of Egyptian archeological evidence for Israel in Egypt unveiled in this work -
from Abraham's journey to Egypt and his encounter with Pharaoh Mentuhotep II to Moses' deliverance of the children of Israel out of bondage and far beyond …
(in Chapter Chronology)
Chapter Overview
Chapter Chronology Chapter Hyksos Chapter Joseph Chapter Moses
Amenemhet III Pharaoh of the seven year famine
The Chronology
of Israel in Egypt
The 12th to 17th Dynasty
Critically compare the Exodus Late Date Theory, the Exodus Early Date Theory and the Strict Bible Chronology with each other and find out which one delivers superior evidence.
Discover the real rulership history of the Second Intermediate Period within 215 years from the 13th to 17th Dynasty: A Chronology enlightening a contradictory so called "dark period of uncertain time estimates with high degrees of speculation" finally transforming it into working order.
Compare the evidence of this Chapter with world’s opinion leader Israel Finkelstein’s antibiblical lecture on the same topic on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TfpRUj9qoEU in order to find out whose evidence is superior in quantity and quality.
Amenemhet's Semitic Highest Royal Official
Who were
the Hyksos?
The 14th & 15th Dynasty?
The 12th to 13th Dynasty?
The 16th & 17th Dynasty?
If You want to discover crucial new evidence for the History of Israel in Egypt and for the dissolution of the millenia old Hyksos-Israel Controversy up until today then this is your chapter: Explore deeply Bietak’s Avaris excavation results, ancient Qumran Scripture Evidence, and the greatest ancient historians of Egypt and Israel unveiling the differences between the first peaceful Foreign Semitic Rulers over Egypt the Hebrew Shepherd Kings and the second Foreign Semitic Rulers the Canaanite Amorites from Assur, who enslaved Israel.
Compare the evidence in this Chapter with world’s opinion leader Manfred Bietak’s lecture on the same topic on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ck4ZJFXYzaM in order to find out who delivers superior evidence.
Amenemhet's Grandvizier and "Real Friend"
Who were
Joseph's Pharaohs?
The 13th Dynasty
If You want to explore previous discovered archeological evidence for the time of Israel in Egypt, watch Roger Liebi's lectures on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBZnEq1JC84.
In this chapter You will discover NEW archeological evidence unveiling JOSEPH‘s historical identity and rulership over Egypt: As ruler over Egypt he typically owned several different names eg. ZaMonth Khnumhotep and Monthotep all identified as one and the same Vizier and King by the identical names of his adoptive father (Khumhotep) his wife (Henut) and his son (Ankhu). Discover the truth about the eliminated history of the 13th Dynasty: A Hebrew yearly Pharaoh rotation system of Shepherd Kings under the overall Kingship of JOSEPH ensured peace and prosperity of the last phase of the so called Golden Age of Egypt.
Prince of Egypt
Leader of Israel
Who were
Mose's Pharaohs?
The 16th & 17th Dynasty
If You want to discover and explore NEW archeological evidence corroborating the history of Israel's Enslavement, of MOSES, of the Ten Plagues and of the Exodus then this is Your Chapter:
The time of Canaanite opression over Egypt after the Hyksos Invasion has also been the time of Israel’s Enslavement. The difference between former Hebrew and later Canaanite Semitic foreign rulership over Egypt could not show more contrast: Peace and stability were replaced by desctruction, violence and cruelty. Explore NEW evidence for Israel's decreasing Dynasty of Shepherd Kings in the South, for MOSES' time as Prince of Egyt, for the TEN PLAGUES and for the EXODUS. Learn to understand how the time of Israel in Egypt did get lost in Egyptian History …
The Bible nearly only talks
about the 22 years between Joseph’s and Israel’s arrival in Egypt,
about Jacob‘s and Joseph’s death,
about the enslavement of Israel in Egypt,
about Moses‘ birth, flight out of Egypt, and exile in Midian,
and finally about the one year of Moses‘ return to Egypt, the Ten Plagues, and Israel’s Exodus of Egypt.
These biblical stories are unveiled as archeologically evidenced History of Israel in Egypt - generally in Capter CHRONOLOGY and deeply and precisely in Chapter JOSEPH & MOSES.
The two biblically untold centuries of Israel in Egypt in between are entirely unveiled in CHAPTER JOSEPH & MOSES.
The question who are the Hyksos described by ancient Egyptian historian Manetho - Hebrew Shepherd Kings or Canaanite Rulers of Foreign Lands - is the deciding question of the Second Intermediate Period of Egyptian History.
Ancient historian Manetho writes they were Eastern Semites from Arabia, Rulers of Foreign Lands, Shepherd Kings, and/or Captive Shepherds.
Ancient historians Josephus, Africanus, and Eusebius conclude they were the Israelites.
Current leading Egyptologists Redford and Ryholt deliver evidence confirming they were Eastern Semites who invaded and conquered Egypt.
Avaris excavator Bietak discards all the ancient historians and proclaims he has finally solved the Hyksos riddle; they allegedly were peacefully immigrated Canaanite Amorites from a region including Assur.
The Bible says a foreign King from Assur enslaved Israel in Egypt and the Book of Jubilees states a Canaanite King from Assur invaded Egypt and enslaved Israel.
CHAPTER HYKSOS will resolve and clarify all these seeming contradictions.
This work unveils the gapless entire History of Israel in Egypt even between all biblical events.
The three biggest historical gaps between biblical events in CHAPTER JOSEPH are
the two decades between Israel’s arrival in Egypt and Father Jacob’s death
half a century between Jacob‘s and Joseph’s death
and the two decades between Joseph’s death and the Enslavement of Israel.
All these biblically undescribed times are historically unveiled and archeologically corroborated in CHAPTER JOSEPH.
They will archeologically evidenced irrefutably turn out to be part of the by ancient historians Josephus, Africanus, and Eusebius stated History of the HEBREW SHEPHERD KINGS of Egypt.
The three biggest gaps in the History of Israel in Egypt between biblical events in CHAPTER MOSES are
the four decades between the enslavement of Israel and the birth of Moses,
the four decades between the birth of Moses and his flight to Midian,
and the four decades of Moses’ exile in Midian until his return to Egypt, the Ten Plagues and the Exodus of Israel out of Egypt.
All these biblically undescribed times of the History Israel in Egypt are inclusively unveiled and archeologically corroborated in CHAPTER MOSES.
They archeologically confirm the by ancient historians Josephus, Africanus, and Eusebius described History of the HEBREW SHEPHERD KINGS of Egypt.
This work proves theological truths in the Bible being intimately connected to historical reality.
The theological is deeply anchored in the historical.
The true faith of Israel has always been based on the truthful history of Israel from its very first day on.
The true faith of Christianity has always been based on the truthful history of Christianity from the very first day on AND
on the truthful history of Israel from its very first days on.
That is how it has always been until the last hundred years of apostasy …
Table of Contents
CHAPTER CHRONOLOGY
The Chronology of Israel in Egypt
The 12th to 17th Dynasty
The Chronology Controversy
Chronological cornerstones of the time of Israel in Egypt
The Time of Israel‘s Exodus out of Egypt is also the time of Ahmose’s Expulsion of the Hyksos
1821-1606 BC: The time of Israel in Egypt was 215 years not 430 years
Critical Comparison
Late Date Theory - Early Date Theory - Strict Bible Chronology
The archeologically evidenced strictly biblical Chronology of Israel in Egypt
including Abraham’s archeologically evidenced Pharaoh
The archeologically evidenced strictly biblical Chronology of the time of Israel’s Judges and Kings
The Bible Forgery based Exodus Ramesses Time Paradigm
disproven by Jericho‘s destruction at 1566 BC
Is Ra’amezes a biblically updated town name of Avaris?
Liebi’s rediscovered ancient first and only unmanipulated Strictly Biblical Chronology
1606 BC:
The Exodus of Israel
and the ensuing Expulsion of the Canaanites
The biblical 430 years of Abraham, Isaac and Israel in Foreign Lands
Conclusions
The Royal Genealogy of Israel in Egypt
CHAPTER HYKSOS
Who were the Hyksos?
The 14th & 15th Dynasty?
The 12th to 13th Dynasty?
The 16th & 17th Dynasty?
The Hyksos Controversy
1729-1606 BC: Chronological Overview of the Canaanite 15th Dynasty
Avaris is biblical Raamezez
Avaris excavation layers archeologically match the History of Israel in Egypt
The Bible says: A Foreign Ruler rose up against Egypt and enslaved Israel
Qumran Find: The Book of Jubilees
Evidence ABC
for the first Canaanite Hyksos King being the biblical new King who enslaved Israel
Evidence A
The Canaanite Hyksos Invasion 1729 BC in The Book of Jubilees
Evidence B
The Foreign King (Hyksos) in the Bible
Evidence C
Canaanite Assur oppressing Israel in the Bible and the Book of Jubilees
The violent Hyksos Invasion Canaanites of the 15th Dynasty are not the peaceful Hekakhasut Settlement Semites of the 12th Dynasty
Hekakhasut or Hyksos
Shepherd Kings or Rulers of Foreign Lands
THE PSEUDO MANETHO INTERPOLATION
Arguments of Bietak for calling the peaceful settling Hekakhasut 1821 BC
“for convenience sake Canaanites”
Latest Avaris Excavation analysis results of Bietak
The Diversity of the Hyksos
Fundamental differences between the Semites of the 15th and 12th/13th Dynasty
The Egyptians were able to distinguish between Canaanites and other different Semites
The first Hekakhasut was a Ruler of Foreign Lands and Hebrew Shepherdking: Joseph
1729-1606 BC: The real Dark Period of Egyptian History was also the Dark Period of Israel in Egypt
Conclusions
The Royal Genealogy of Israel in Egypt
CHAPTER JOSEPH
Who were Joseph’s Pharaohs?
The 13th Dynasty
Introducing summary of the lost History of Joseph’s 13th Dynasty of Egypt
Chronological Overview of Pharaohs in the Vizierkingship time of Joseph and his son Ephraim
The Famine and Grandvizier Joseph in the time of Pharaoh Senwosret III and his son Amenemhet III
Maps of Ancient Egypt
The oldest Alphabet was found in Egypt: It was Hebrew and firstly appeared in the time of Joseph
Archeologically evidenced graves of Joseph in Egypt and Israel
Five different Vizier names without remains in the Viziership time of Joseph
Could the tomb of Vizier Khnumhotep III be a third grave of Joseph?
Is Khumhotep II biblical Potiphar slavemaster of Joseph?
The story of Joseph and Potiphar turns out to be the History of Khnumhotep III and II
Israel in Egypt archeologically evidenced in the tomb of Khnumhotep II
The burial time of Khnumhotep II in the time of the Settlement of Israel in Egypt
Family picture of Father Jacob’s Family in the tomb of Khnumhotep II
Zamonth and Khnumhotep are two different names of one and the same Vizier
Joseph’s Viziernames Zamonth and Khnumhotep and his Pharaohnic sons
Joseph’s wife Asenath is Vizier Khnumhotep’s wife Henut
1753 BC: Ancient Alphabetical Inscription in Egypt of Asenath’s biblical name
The children of Joseph and Asenath were Viziers and Pharaohs
Joseph and his sons’ additional Viziername Senwosret unveils Ephraim as Vizierking after Joseph
Joseph’s son Ephraim is Zamonth’s son Ankhu
The 13th Dynasty was ruled by Vizierkings
Joseph’s brother Benjamin was Pharaoh Amenemhet IV and his sons were his successors
Intermezzo: Amenemhet’s III daughter Sobekneferu becomes Pharaoh for four years
Hebrew Shepherd Kings of the 13th Dynasty
Joseph‘s and Ephraim’s Hekakhasut Family Clan
Joseph’s death and Manasse’s birthright claims
Manasse’s sons become Pharaohs under Vizierking Ephraim
Manasse’s sons return to the South after they fail to take over the throne
The first Pharaos of the 16th Dynasty
Biblical Evidence of the Idolatry of Israel in Egypt
Vizier Zamonth and his son Senebefni are Joseph and his son Manasse
Joseph’s son Manasse unveiled as initiator of the „Egyptian Origin of Monotheism“
Joseph and Asenath against their will worshipped in Egyptian Idolatry
Joseph worshipped as Shepherd King Osiris &
Asenath worshipped as Isis wife of Osiris
Israelites who remained in Egypt after the Exodus
Leontopolis and the ancient Story of Joseph & Asenath
Descendants of Manasse who remained in Southern Egypt
Elephantine and the Temple of Jahew & Anat
Joseph & Asenath and the Golden Calf
The Royal Genealogy of Israel in Egypt
CHAPTER MOSES
Who were Moses‘ Pharaohs?
The 16th & 17th Dynasty
Introducing Summary of the 16th & 17th Dynasty:
The rival lineages of Ephraim & Manasse,
the Canaanites, the Egyptians, and Moses
Chronological Overview of Kings and Pharaohs
in the time of Israel’s Enslavement
1729-1606 BC: Israel’s different phases of Enslavement
The last page of the Brooklyn Papyrus 35.1446 Slave List full of Hebrew and biblical names is
the rescue list of Joseph’s grandson Shutelah
Alphabetical Hebrew Inscription of around 1686 BC found in Egypt corroborate
the biblical massmurder of all Hebrew male infants
Moses is born - The brightest ray of hope in the darkest hour of Israel in Egypt
Moses royal adoptive parent's are
Northern Canaanite Hyksos Pharaoh‘s Biblical Daughter &
Southern Hebrew Pharaoh Sobekhotep IV
The 16th & 17th Dynasty of Southern Egypt are
the third and fourth generation of Hebrew Shepherd Kings
The 16th Dynasty I
Vizier Senebhenef the son of Vizier Senebefni is Manasse’s son Heleq
The 16th Dynasty II
Vizierkings Ankhu and Resseneb are
Ephraim and his son Shutelah
The 16th Dynasty III
Vizierking Iyumeru Aya is
Ephraim’s son Beriah
The 17th Dynasty I
Beriah’s son Vizierking Refach and Manasse’s legitimate lineage
The 17th Dynasty II
Manasse’s illegitamate lineage
Sobekhotep IV becomes Pharaohking of Egypt
Moses visits his slavework suffering people -
The Prince of Egypt chooses to become a slave
Moses and Joseph were the archeologically evidenced
most famous contemporary heroes of Egypt
1646-1606 BC
Moses flees to Midian in Arabia and lives there for 40 years
The 17th Dynasty III
The Ahmosides
The Egyptians are back on the throne
Contemporary ancient alphabetical Hebrew inscription in Egypt evidences Moses’ name
Evidenced idols of Israel in Egypt are matching the idols humiliated by the Ten Plagues
1606 BC
The geologically and archaeologically evidenced Ten Plagues
The Ten Plagues from Egyptian perspective
Ypuwer Papyrus & Ahmose Storm Stela
Pharaoh Ahmose’s I first born son dies young in the time of the Ten Plagues
The last Pyramid of an Egyptian Pharaoh was built by Hebrew slaves
Pharaoh and the King of Egypt are distinguished as such by the Bible
Ahmose’s Expulsion of the Canaanite Hyksos
after the Exodus of Israel out Egypt in the same year
Ahmose’s successful history elimination attempt
The lost army of the Canaanite Hyksos
Last Open Questions
The Royal Genealogy of Israel in Egypt
The History of Israel in Egypt
Reality or Myth?
This work does not stop at the end of the Second Intermediate Period of Egyptian History and the History of Israel in Egypt (see Chapter Chronology 1566-722 BC). It also starts to enlighten the Darkened Period of the History of Israel thereafter: Israel’s Conquest of the Promised Land, the Time of the Judges, and the Kingdom of David and Solomon.
The open offense of Bible opponents officially called minimalists exploded with Kenyon’s post war discovery of Jericho’s destruction in the mid 16th century BC proving a much older destruction date than that of her predecessors who held on the Ramesses Time Exodus Hypothesis (Chapter Chronology 1566 BC). The by Jericho disproved highly speculative non biblical no evidence delivering Ramesses Time Exodus Hypothesis has from then on up until today paradoxically been dogmatized by the same lobbyists that had previously disproven it by Jericho. Without this implausible dogmatization of the Ramesses Time Exodus Hypothesis the intentions behind would come to nothing: Irreversibly disproving any historicity and credibility of the Bible. Since then "Chronology does not allow“ anymore ANY earlier time of the Exodus of Israel out of Egypt than the 13th century BC. This complex destraction successfully caused an earthquake in the history of Biblical Archaeology apparently not only having shaken the trust in the historicity of the Bible but seemingly having debunked its credibility as null and void.
This is exactly the reason why this work will additionally deliver the final evidenced answer on the question
Has Jericho irrefutably DISPROVEN or PROVEN
the Historicity and Credibility of the Bible?
The Veil of contradictory chaos
on Biblical Archeology
will be removed …
But before You climb up the chronological ladder of evidence and dive down into the deep of the three sea ground evidence cornerstones of Israel in Egypt - Settlement, Enslavement andExodus - feel invited to enjoy flying over the contemporary ancient land of Egypt on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omajagaozk0 and through a normal work-life day of an ancient Egyptian on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZQE4BVUEg4&list=WL&index=23&t=0s to get a first glance into and in order to better understand the time of Israel's sojourn in Egypt.
The History of Israel in Egypt: Questions & Answers
Reach us on WhatsApp